Blockchain & Crypto

Indian govt. has no proposal to recognise Bitcoin as a currency: FM

In response to a starred question in the Parliament, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has revealed that the government doesn’t have any proposal to recognise Bitcoin as a currency in the country. She also revealed that the government does not collect data on Bitcoin transactions.

Earlier this year, El Salvador became the first country to make Bitcoin a legal tender. However, the International Monetary Fund has remarked the move as a “step too far”.

Answers to Queries

The response came to questions raised by Sumalatha Ambareesh and Doddaalahalli Kempegowda Suresh. The Members of Lok Sabha asked:

(a) whether the Government is aware that Bitcoin transaction is silently blooming in India in the recent years;

(b) if so, the details thereof and the response of the Government in this regard;

(c) whether the Government has any proposal to recognise Bitcoin as a currency in the country; and

(d) if so, the details thereof?

To questions (a), the Finance Minister answered that the “Government does not collect data on Bitcoin Transactions”. In response to the question (c), she simply said “No, sir.”

But what about the recent Company Law Amendment?

It is pertinent to note that the government introduced amendments to the company rules (Schedule III) in March, 2021. The new disclosure rules require companies to disclose dealings in cryptocurrencies.

Prima facie, the statement seems to ignore the amendment. That begs the question, if the Minister’s statement is entirely correct? To understand the issue, we reached out to Mr. Ashwini Sharma, a technology lawyer and founder of Maadhyam Law Associates.

According to Ashwini, additional reporting requirements do not ask information regarding transactions, i.e., they do not ask the entity or any details related to such an entity, with which a company has traded cryptocurrencies. They do not ask details related to the transactions, i.e., when they occurred and the volume of transactions, or the purpose of such transactions. He adds:

“Those additional reporting requirements only ask information regarding the reporting company’s own profits and losses arising from transactions related to crypto currency, the amount of currency held by it on the reporting date, and if it has taken any fiat money from any person for the purposes of transacting in crypto.”

Surveillance on Crypto Transactions

The government introduced the additional reporting requirements in order to keep tabs on a reporting company’s exposure to risky assets. This must be viewed in the context of Elon Musk’s company, Tesla’s disclosure one month earlier in February 2021, which was made to the US’ regulator SEC, wherein Tesla confirmed that their treasury had purchased bitcoin worth 1.5 billion USD as part of their amended investment policy to diversify returns on disposable cash, not required for maintaining adequate operating liability.

Ashiwini remarks, “Tesla’s actions led to companies getting the idea that their disposable liquidity could be parked in alternative assets. Hence, the GoI introduced a pre-emptive reporting requirement to keep tabs on how much a company’s treasury is exposed to such alternative risky assets.” Therefore, it will be “inapt to say that the government collects data on Bitcoin transactions through the additional reporting requirements” laid down under Schedule III. It rather aims to reveal a company’s treasury’s exposure to risky assets.

Further, as per Ashwini, the statement also mitigates investors’ fears of government surveillance on crypto transactions. Even more so since the question asks if the “government is aware that Bitcoin transaction is silently blooming in India in the recent years”. The FM’s statement assures that the government does not undertake surveillance measures regarding Bitcoin transactions.

However, companies that use their treasury to invest in Bitcoin may have to report the amount of Bitcoin that is held, any profits/losses made from such holdings, and if any money was borrowed from others for making such investments. The Government does not look into on-chain data for examining transactions.

Do subscribe to our Telegram group for more resources and discussions on tech-law & policy. To receive weekly updates, don’t forget to subscribe to our Newsletter.

Rohit Ranjan Praveer

Rohit is a practicing advocate at Delhi. Beginning as a tech enthusiast, Rohit always had a keen interest in computer forensics and information security. Building upon these fundamentals, he has undertaken extensive research on various techno-legal topics and continues his pursuit pass on valuable information to the masses, with a zeal to build something that outlasts him.​

Share your thoughts!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.