Tech Verdicts

SC upholds summons to Facebook by Delhi Assembly’s Riots Panel

On 8th July 2021, the Supreme Court upheld the authority of the Delhi Assembly’s Riots Panel: Peace and Harmony Committee to summon Facebook India’s senior official Ajit Mohan. This summons concerns the February 2020 communal violence in the capital. 

Three Judge-bench led by Justice SK Kaul said:

Capital can ill-afford another riot, and the role of Facebook must be looked into in this context. It is difficult to accept the simplistic approach adopted by Facebook that it is merely a platform posting third-party information and has no role in generating, controlling, and modulating that information.”

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court delivered a 188-page judgment pointing out how social media platforms like Facebook have become power centres, how they can influence vast sections of public opinions.

Facebook is one of the most popular social media platforms in India with around 270 million registered users. Facebook acknowledged the fact that they’ve removed 22.5 million pieces of ‘hate speech content’ in the second quarter of 2020 itself. 

“It cannot claim any exceptional privilege to refrain from appearing before the Peace and Harmony committee constituted by the Delhi Assembly.” However, the court said, “the Facebook representative appearing before the committee need not answer any query directly regarding the law, order, and Police.”  

Premature Appeal  

The Delhi Assembly Peace and Harmony Committee was formed last year after the riots in Delhi. The committee was set up under the chairmanship of Mr. Raghav Chadha. Facebook India’s MD & Vice President Ajit Mohan failed to appear for its third hearing despite having been summoned. The same summons was thereafter challenged by Ajit Mohan in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court rejected the appeal and termed it “premature” as no coercive action was taken or intended. The committee merely wanted to depose him as a witness. The Court rejected Facebook’s arguments that the committee had no jurisdiction over law and order in Delhi. In addition, the Court further emphasised the point that “The concept of peace and harmony goes much beyond law and order and police. The unfortunate communal riots led to the death of 53 persons and caused significant damage. Their ramifications are affecting the citizens of Delhi. It cannot be said that Delhi Govt cannot look into the causal factors to formulate appropriate remedial measures.”.  

Do subscribe to our Telegram channel for more resources and discussions on tech-law. To receive weekly updates, don’t forget to subscribe to our Newsletter.

Pukhraj Biala

I am an undergraduate student at Symbiosis Law school, NOIDA, pursuing B.A.LL.B. I am a problem solver who believes in reaching to a conclusion by weighing all the options and identifying the best possible one. I find Technology Laws quite fascinating and I continue to follow and learn the subject.

Share your thoughts!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.