Information TechnologyTechnology Policy

US Federal judge blocks Florida’s Social Media Law

A US Federal Judge has blocked the controversial social media law of Florida. Two months back, the State of Florida passed a Bill aimed to stop big tech platforms from banning politicians. The law aimed to make big tech platforms more accountable for their content decisions.

Although social media companies deny any political bias in their decisions to ban/ restrict content and users, the bill said that “social media platforms have unfairly censored, shadow banned [and] de-platformed” Floridians, the Wall Street Journal reported.


The Law, passed in the backdrop of social media giants’ controversial ban on former President Donald Trump. The new law prohibited Companies from banning any Floridian political candidate. Additionally, the law prohibited large social media platforms from banning or deleting a Florida political candidate’s account for more than 14 days

The law not only protected politicians but also journalists and news organisations. It made it illegal to restrict or deplatform journalists depending on their material.

The Lawsuit

Against this backdrop, internet lobbying groups NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) challenged the new law. Facebook, Twitter, and Alphabet’s Google are among the group’s members. The lawsuit claimed that the Bill is unconstitutional.

“We cannot stand idly by as Florida’s lawmakers push unconstitutional bills into law that brings us closer to state-run media and a state-run internet,” said NetChoice’s Vice President Carl Szabo. “The First Amendment protects social media platforms’ right to host and moderate content as they see fit for their business models and users.”

Christina Pushaw, a spokeswoman for Republican DeSantis, said the governor’s office had no comment on any specific lawsuit but that it had anticipated legal challenges and was confident the legislation had a “strong legal basis.”

The Order

U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle ordered a preliminary injunction preventing the law’s implementation. The law was set to begin on Thursday. The judge stated that parts of the legislation violate the First Amendment.

“The plaintiffs are likely to prevail on the merits of their claim that these statutes violate the First Amendment,” Hinkle wrote. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees citizens the right to free speech.

Do subscribe to our Telegram channel for more resources and discussions on technology law and news. To receive weekly updates, don’t forget to subscribe to our Newsletter.

Rajat Chawda

Rajat is a student at the Institute of Law, Nirma University. Since a young age, he was fascinated by the technological advancements and his fascination with gadgets has helped him develop a keen interest in TMT Laws in his journey as a law student. He is associated with Mylawrd to further engage himself and learn in this area.

Share your thoughts!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.