Information Technology

Supreme Court releases Draft Rules for Live Streaming of Court Proceedings

E-Committee of the Supreme Court of India has released the Draft Model Rules for Live Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings. The committee has invited feedback and suggestions on the draft rules from all the stakeholders.

The step is taken under the National Policy and Action Plan for implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Indian Judiciary. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court and the Chairperson of the committee, has also written a letter to all Chief Justices of the High Court calling for feedback on the draft rules for live streaming.

A sub-committee consisting of judges of the Bombay, Delhi, Madras, and Karnataka High Courts was constituted to frame the rules. The sub-committee held extensive deliberations and also took into account the principles enunciated in the decision of the Supreme Court in Swapnil Tripathi v Supreme Court of India,(2018) 10 SCC 639.

Suggestions and feedback can be sent to [email protected] on or before 30.06.2021.

Dedicated Control Rooms

The draft rules discuss about the hardware (cameras, microphones) and their placement and control. In case of a remote location, the rules provision for appropriate hardware to be deployed to the extent practicable.

The rules aim to create a dedicated control room for each court complex. This room will coordinate with court appointed technical experts and monitor proceedings as they are live streamed, recorded, and transcribed.

Live-streaming and Recording of Proceedings

The rules also take into account the concerns of privacy and confidentiality of litigants and witness. All proceedings can be live streamed, except matrimonial matters, cases concerning sexual offences including POCSO, offences under Juvenile Justice Act, and in camera proceedings.

Courts also have the power to restrict live streaming through a written and reasoned order, where it thinks that it would be antithetical to the administration of justice.

Other than that, recording of evidence and cross-examination, and privileged communication between parties will be excluded from live streaming.

It would be the duty of the Court Master/ Reader to inform all parties about live streaming, before the proceedings commence. If any party has any objection, it can raise it before the bench.

Archiving the Recording

In case the proceedings are not live-streamed, the court shall maintain recordings. It can be made available to the advocate or litigant-in-person. It may also be uploaded on the Courts’ website.

However, notes, documents, discussions amongst the judges will not be live streamed or saved in archival data.

Do subscribe to our Telegram channel for more resources and discussions on technology law and news. To receive weekly updates, don’t forget to subscribe to our Newsletter.

You can also follow us on InstagramFacebookLinkedIn, and Twitter for frequent updates and news flashes about #technologylaw.

Rohit Ranjan Praveer

Rohit is a practicing advocate at Delhi. Beginning as a tech enthusiast, Rohit always had a keen interest in computer forensics and information security. Building upon these fundamentals, he has undertaken extensive research on various techno-legal topics and continues his pursuit pass on valuable information to the masses, with a zeal to build something that outlasts him.​

Share your thoughts!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.