Making Aadhar mandatory is violative of Puttaswamy Judgment: Telangana HC
This case discusses the validity of the Telangana Government’s requirement of Aadhar details of citizens. The Telangana Government introduced ‘Dharani’ Portal, a land reform initiative. This was the government’s one of the attempts to make Aadhar mandatory and collect details of citizens as part of its ambitious land reform scheme. The petitioners challenged the State’s decision of collecting Aadhar details from agricultural and non-agricultural property owners.
The state’s insistence of making Aadhar mandatory is violative of the KS Puttaswamy judgment pronounced by the Supreme Court which upheld the right privacy.
The court noted that according to the Aadhar Act, 2016. Aadhar details can only be used for welfare schemes and the Telangana Rights in Land and Patidar Pass Books Act, 2020, nowhere prescribes the collection of details by means of Aadhar.
The court further went on to observe that the balance of convenience is in favor of the petitioners as the State would not lose anything if Aadhar details were not provided but the citizens would be forced to reveal their personal data and were exposed to the risk of losing vital personal information.
The court by means of an interim order has directed the state government to not make Aadhar mandatory and collect Aadhar information for the purpose of the scheme.
The Telangana High Court also raised apprehension over how the data collected would be protected. The court questioned the state government as to who would be in possession of the data, and who would have access to the information or how it would be protected.
Case Name: Sakth Kasibhatla vs. State of Telangana
Citation: W.P (PIL) 254/2020
Court: Telangana Hight Court
Do subscribe to our Telegram channel for more resources and discussions on tech-law. To receive weekly updates, don’t forget to subscribe to our Newsletter.
You can also follow us on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter for frequent updates and news flashes about #technologylaw.